Prcis from Aristotle's De Generatione et Corruptione II.9 (335b8) Assignment

Prcis from Aristotles De Generati cardinal et Corruptione II.9 (335b8) - Assignment ExampleKnowledge is seen as an essential component in ones life. In addition, Aristotle believes that there are some things that live on in the commonsense foundation and have essential natures. He continues to add that there are things which hold out in the sensible world that can non be otherwise plus acquiring knowledge of the things is possible. Aristotle simple brings the force of acquiring knowledge of the unknown which exist in the sensible world. A good example of this could be the knowledge of the soul which is discussed in his Phaedo. Concerning Aristotles Phaedo, its sole purpose was to talk about the human soul. match to Aristotle, the soul is regarded as immortal. He argues that the soul before it started to live in a human dead body at birth, meant it came from somewhere, and after death, will excessively have to go somewhere. This correlation brought to him coming up with the pos sibilities of dickens worlds existing separate from each other. He refers one of the worlds as a world of sensible particulars and the other, the world of form. The world of sensible particulars as discussed by Aristotle contains objects that can be touched and have sense. He adds that they accommodate living things with souls like plants, animals and man. In addition, the world of form contains aspects that exist in objects. Aristotle also refers to forms as comprehensive aspects. He adds that the soul is in between these two worlds since he argues that the soul existed before birth and would go through to where it came from after death. He continues by saying that when one is alive, the soul is trapped in ones body and by so living in the sensible world. Souls according to Aristotle are regarded as sensible things by being particular in contrast to forms which are universal. Aristotle depicts the souls as the first actuality of any ingrained body and got the potential of havi ng life. The catch will be that the soul has to occupy a body with variety meat in order for life to exist. In addition, the soul cannot exist without immorality. Aristotle insists that the soul may leave a body when dead and remains in the world, wonders until when it gets another body to live. In the world of forms, Aristotle rejected Platos theory of forms that stated that properties like beauty are generally abstract universal entities which exist all independent of the objects. Instead, Aristotle argues that forms cannot exist apart from objects since they are intrinsic to them. However, when he discusses art, Aristotle rejects this theory. He instead adds that artists try to grip idealized universal forms. The nature of universals in Aristotles philosophy therefore hinges on his view of natural kinds. Aristotle basically transformed Platos forms to formal grammatical cases, the essence or blueprints of individual things. Concerning the formal causes, Aristotle argues form s are powerless in explaining wherefore things change or die since they cannot alter or move physical objects of sensation. He adds that forms may not be of importance in explaining how we get knowledge of particular things. This he supports by arguing that one cannot get knowledge of a substance before getting knowledge of the substance in it. Aristotle also argues forms could not explain the existence of particular objects. Aristotle basically refutes his teachers teachings and comes with his own perspective of what cause are. Therefore according to Aris